Vulnerabilidades em Google
7.001 resultadosAnálise Vexday
Com 4.763 CVEs catalogadas e 77 confirmadas em exploração ativa pelo CISA KEV, a taxa de exploração dos produtos Google é 3,6 vezes superior à média geral do catálogo, sinalizando risco operacional elevado para organizações que dependem desse ecossistema. O volume de 1.225 CVEs surgidas nos últimos 90 dias indica cadência intensa de descobertas, exigindo ciclos de patching ágeis. O tipo de falha mais recorrente é CWE-416 (use-after-free), classe de vulnerabilidade que frequentemente viabiliza execução de código arbitrário e escalada de privilégios. Destaque especial para CVE-2023-4863, com EPSS de 0,9974 — valor próximo ao máximo possível —, indicando probabilidade altíssima de exploração ativa e merecendo tratamento prioritário imediato.
CVE-2025-48578HIGHIn multiple functions of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible way to bypass the WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission due to a missing permisEPSS 0.1%CVE-2018-9405MEDIUMIn BnDmAgent::onTransact of dm_agent.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local esEPSS 0.1%CVE-2023-40117HIGHIn resetSettingsLocked of SettingsProvider.java, there is a possible lockscreen bypass due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to localEPSS 0.1%CVE-2023-40110MEDIUMIn multiple functions of MtpPacket.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escaEPSS 0.1%CVE-2026-0135HIGHIn Modem, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional EPSS 0.1%CVE-2026-17654HIGHRace in Updater in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a local attacker to perform OS-level privilege escalation via a malicEPSS 0.1%CVE-2026-58747MEDIUMIn smmu_detach_dev of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalaEPSS 0.1%CVE-2024-0027MEDIUMIn multiple functions of SnoozeHelper.java, there is a possible way to cause a boot loop due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to locaEPSS 0.1%CVE-2023-21329—In Activity Manager, there is a possible way to determine whether an app is installed due to a missing permission check. This could lead to EPSS 0.1%CVE-2026-56979MEDIUMIn multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilEPSS 0.1%CVE-2025-48619HIGHIn multiple functions of ContentProvider.java, there is a possible way for an app with read-only access to truncate files due to a logic errEPSS 0.1%CVE-2025-48639HIGHIn DefaultTransitionHandler.java, there is a possible way to unknowingly grant permissions to an app due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. ThiEPSS 0.1%CVE-2023-21296—In Permission, there is a possible way to determine whether an app is installed, without query permissions, due to side channel information EPSS 0.1%CVE-2026-56973MEDIUMIn multiple locations, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of EPSS 0.1%CVE-2026-58767MEDIUMIn multiple functions of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to locEPSS 0.1%CVE-2026-0017HIGHIn onChange of BiometricService.java, there is a possible way to enable fingerprint unlock due to a logic error in the code. This could leadEPSS 0.1%CVE-2025-22421MEDIUMIn contentDescForNotification of NotificationContentDescription.kt, there is a possible notification content leak through the lockscreen dueEPSS 0.1%CVE-2018-9464HIGHIn multiple locations, there is a possible way to read protected files due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalatioEPSS 0.1%CVE-2026-55302MEDIUMIn multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilEPSS 0.1%CVE-2026-58751MEDIUMIn multiple functions of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalaEPSS 0.1%