CVE-2026-20127
Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
In short
A flaw in Cisco SD-WAN Controller's authentication system allows attackers to bypass login requirements and gain administrative access without credentials. This is critical because attackers can take control of network configuration affecting all connected devices.
Technical detail
The peering authentication mechanism in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, Manager, and Validator fails to properly validate requests, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers to obtain high-privileged internal account access. Successful exploitation grants NETCONF access, allowing manipulation of SD-WAN fabric configuration and potentially compromising the entire SD-WAN infrastructure.
Summary generated and translated by AI from the official description.
A vulnerability in the peering authentication in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller, formerly SD-WAN vSmart, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly SD-WAN vManage, and Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Validator, formerly SD-WAN vBond, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and obtain administrative privileges on an affected system.
This vulnerability exists because the peering authentication mechanism in an affected system is not working properly. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to log in to an affected Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Controller as an internal, high-privileged, non-root user account. Using this account, the attacker could access NETCONF, which would then allow the attacker to manipulate network configuration for the SD-WAN fabric.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Affected products
Cisco · Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Managerpublic PoCs found — 1
githubgithub.com/0xBlackash/CVE-2026-20127★ 0⚠ Public resources, to assess the exposure of systems you control or are authorized to test. Test only with authorization.
Want to know if your infrastructure is exposed to this?
Talk to TrueHacking →