Weaknesses of type CWE-444

365 results

Interpretação inconsistente de requisições HTTP (HTTP Request Smuggling)

Ocorre quando um proxy, load balancer ou firewall interpreta uma requisição HTTP de forma diferente do servidor backend. O atacante injeta headers ou manipula o tamanho do corpo da requisição (via Content-Length ou Transfer-Encoding) para fazer o intermediário e o servidor final processar requisições distintas. Isso permite contornar controles de segurança, envenenar caches, sequestrar sessões de outros usuários ou executar ataques no servidor.

Example

Um atacante envia uma requisição com dois headers Content-Length conflitantes, ou mistura Content-Length com Transfer-Encoding chunked. O proxy interpreta o fim da requisição em um ponto, enquanto o servidor backend interpreta em outro, fazendo com que parte do payload do atacante seja concatenado à próxima requisição de um usuário legítimo.

How to mitigate

Normalize e valide rigorosamente headers HTTP (Content-Length, Transfer-Encoding) em proxies e servidores; use HTTP/2 ou HTTP/3 que mitigam o problema; mantenha proxy e backend sincronizados quanto à interpretação de requisições; desabilite HTTP/1.0 se possível e aplique filtros que rejeitem requisições ambíguas ou malformadas.

CVE-2025-31137HIGHRemix and React Router allow URL manipulation via Host / X-Forwarded-Host headersEPSS 1.2%CVE-2024-34350HIGHNext.js Vulnerable to HTTP Request SmugglingEPSS 1.2%CVE-2022-0552—A flaw was found in the original fix for the netty-codec-http CVE-2021-21409, where the OpenShift Logging openshift-logging/elasticsearch6-rEPSS 1.2%CVE-2024-27982MEDIUMThe team has identified a critical vulnerability in the http server of the most recent version of Node, where malformed headers can lead to EPSS 1.2%CVE-2026-48746CRITICALvLLM: OpenAI auth bypassEPSS 1.2%CVE-2025-49826HIGHNext.js DoS vulnerability via cache poisoningEPSS 1.1%CVE-2021-32715LOWLenient Parsing of Content-Length Header When Prefixed with Plus SignEPSS 1.1%CVE-2023-4639HIGHUndertow: cookie smuggling/spoofingEPSS 1.1%CVE-2026-93573MEDIUMIo.netty/netty-codec-http: netty split transfer-encoding fields bypass final-chunked validation and enable request smugglingEPSS 1.1%CVE-2024-32638MEDIUMApache APISIX: Forward-Auth Request SmugglingEPSS 1.1%CVE-2026-71324HIGHTraefik: Cross-user response poisoning via proxied CONNECT on Traefik's shared backend keep-alive poolEPSS 1.1%CVE-2021-39214HIGHLacking Protection against HTTP Request Smuggling in mitmproxyEPSS 1.1%CVE-2023-51747HIGHSMTP smuggling in Apache JamesEPSS 1.0%CVE-2026-14180MEDIUMUndertow-core: undertow:http request smuggling via oversized chunk-size bit overlapEPSS 1.0%CVE-2024-23829MEDIUMaiohttp's HTTP parser (the python one, not llhttp) still overly lenient about separatorsEPSS 1.0%CVE-2024-53008MEDIUMInconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') issue exists in HAProxy. If this vulnerability is exploitedEPSS 1.0%CVE-2017-12158—It was found that Keycloak would accept a HOST header URL in the admin console and use it to determine web resource locations. An attacker cEPSS 1.0%CVE-2020-26281MEDIUMrequest smuggling in async-h1EPSS 1.0%CVE-2020-10719MEDIUMA flaw was found in Undertow in versions before 2.1.1.Final, regarding the processing of invalid HTTP requests with large chunk sizes. This EPSS 1.0%CVE-2023-38522HIGHApache Traffic Server: Incomplete field name check allows request smugglingEPSS 1.0%