Vulnerabilities in NodeJS

135 results
Vexday analysis

Com 75 CVEs catalogadas e nenhuma atualmente listada no catálogo KEV da CISA, o Node.js apresenta taxa de exploração ativa abaixo da média geral do catálogo, o que indica pressão ofensiva reduzida no momento. Ainda assim, o score EPSS de 0,8721 associado a CVE-2024-27983 merece atenção prioritária, pois sugere alta probabilidade de exploração calculada por modelos preditivos, mesmo sem confirmação ativa registrada. O tipo de falha mais recorrente é CWE-444 (inconsistência na interpretação de requisições HTTP), categoria que historicamente favorece ataques de request smuggling e bypass de controles intermediários. Com duas CVEs de severidade crítica no inventário e nenhum PoC público conhecido, o risco imediato é moderado, mas CVE-2024-27983 deve ser tratada como prioridade de remediação dado seu perfil de probabilidade elevada.

CVE-2021-44532Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to cEPSS 10.4%CVE-2021-44533Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craEPSS 9.4%CVE-2020-8265Node.js versions before 10.23.1, 12.20.1, 14.15.4, 15.5.1 are vulnerable to a use-after-free bug in its TLS implementation. When writing to EPSS 9.0%CVE-2021-44531Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bEPSS 8.4%CVE-2020-8251Node.js < 14.11.0 is vulnerable to HTTP denial of service (DoS) attacks based on delayed requests submission which can make the server unablEPSS 8.4%CVE-2021-22921Node.js before 16.4.1, 14.17.2, and 12.22.2 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation attacks under certain conditions on Windows platformEPSS 7.4%CVE-2022-32212A OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in Node.js versions <14.20.0, <16.20.0, <18.5.0 due to an insufficient IsAllowedHost check that EPSS 6.1%CVE-2020-8201Node.js < 12.18.4 and < 14.11 can be exploited to perform HTTP desync attacks and deliver malicious payloads to unsuspecting users. The paylEPSS 5.3%CVE-2025-59465HIGHA malformed `HTTP/2 HEADERS` frame with oversized, invalid `HPACK` data can cause Node.js to crash by triggering an unhandled `TLSSocket` erEPSS 4.0%CVE-2023-30589The llhttp parser in the http module in Node v20.2.0 does not strictly use the CRLF sequence to delimit HTTP requests. This can lead to HTTPEPSS 3.9%CVE-2026-48933HIGHA flaw in Node.js WebCrypto implementation can crash the process if the input of `subtle.encrypt()` is a multiple of 2GiB. This vulnerabiEPSS 3.7%CVE-2025-55131HIGHA flaw in Node.js's buffer allocation logic can expose uninitialized memory when allocations are interrupted, when using the `vm` module witEPSS 3.5%CVE-2026-48618HIGHA flaw in Node.js TLS hostname handling can cause Node.js unicode dot separator handling can lead to tls wildcard-depth authentication bypasEPSS 3.2%CVE-2024-22019HIGHA vulnerability in Node.js HTTP servers allows an attacker to send a specially crafted HTTP request with chunked encoding, leading to resourEPSS 3.2%CVE-2021-22959The parser in accepts requests with a space (SP) right after the header name before the colon. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling (HRS)EPSS 3.2%CVE-2022-35256MEDIUMThe llhttp parser in the http module in Node v18.7.0 does not correctly handle header fields that are not terminated with CLRF. This may resEPSS 2.7%CVE-2021-22960The parse function in llhttp < 2.1.4 and < 6.0.6. ignores chunk extensions when parsing the body of chunked requests. This leads to HTTP ReqEPSS 2.5%CVE-2023-23919HIGHA cryptographic vulnerability exists in Node.js <19.2.0, <18.14.1, <16.19.1, <14.21.3 that in some cases did does not clear the OpenSSL erroEPSS 2.2%CVE-2022-32222A cryptographic vulnerability exists on Node.js on linux in versions of 18.x prior to 18.40.0 which allowed a default path for openssl.cnf tEPSS 2.1%CVE-2023-32004HIGHA vulnerability has been discovered in Node.js version 20, specifically within the experimental permission model. This flaw relates to improEPSS 2.1%