Server-Side Forgery Request can be activated unmarshalling with XStream
50Vexday Risk Score
Corrige pronto. Ella tiene exploit funcional público.
ssvc Attendcvss 6.3epss 82%
probabilidad de explotación
82%top 1% de las CVE
explotación observada
noninguna fuente lo reporta
Lo que declaran los fabricantes (VEX)
Declaraciones oficiales de los fabricantes en formato CSAF/VEX: si su producto está afectado, ya corregido o descartado — y por qué. Es afirmación del fabricante, no juicio de Vexday.
Red Hatdocumento VEX ↗
Afectado
11 productos (13 componentes)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · Red Hat BPM Suite 6 · Red Hat Integration Camel K 1 · Red Hat Integration Camel Quarkus 1 · Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6 · y otros 6
workaround: As recommended, use XStream's security framework to implement a whitelist for the allowed types. Users of XStream 1.4.14 who insist to use XStream default blacklist - despite that clear recommendation - can simply add two lines to XStream's setup…
Corregido
6 productos
RHDM 7.11.0 · RHPAM 7.11.0 · Red Hat Data Grid 8.2.0 · Red Hat Fuse 7.9 · Red Hat Integration · y otros 1
No afectado
2 productos (4 componentes) — porque el código vulnerable no está presente en el producto
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 3.11 · Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
XStream is a Java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. In XStream before version 1.4.15, a Server-Side Forgery Request vulnerability can be activated when unmarshalling. The vulnerability may allow a remote attacker to request data from internal resources that are not publicly available only by manipulating the processed input stream. If you rely on XStream's default blacklist of the Security Framework, you will have to use at least version 1.4.15. The reported vulnerability does not exist if running Java 15 or higher. No user is affected who followed the recommendation to setup XStream's Security Framework with a whitelist! Anyone relying on XStream's default blacklist can immediately switch to a whilelist for the allowed types to avoid the vulnerability. Users of XStream 1.4.14 or below who still want to use XStream default blacklist can use a workaround described in more detailed in the referenced advisories.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Productos afectados
x-stream · xstreamReferencias
https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/security/advisories/GHSA-4cch-wxpw-8p28https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r97993e3d78e1f5389b7b172ba9f308440830ce5f051ee62714a0aa34@%3Ccommits.struts.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r97993e3d78e1f5389b7b172ba9f308440830ce5f051ee62714a0aa34%40%3Ccommits.struts.apache.org%3Ehttps://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/12/msg00042.htmlhttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/22KVR6B5IZP3BGQ3HPWIO2FWWCKT3DHP/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PVPHZA7VW2RRSDCOIPP2W6O5ND254TU7/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QGXIU3YDPG6OGTDHMBLAFN7BPBERXREB/https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/22KVR6B5IZP3BGQ3HPWIO2FWWCKT3DHPhttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PVPHZA7VW2RRSDCOIPP2W6O5ND254TU7https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QGXIU3YDPG6OGTDHMBLAFN7BPBERXREBhttps://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210409-0005https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210409-0005/