CVE-2023-41052: fallo de gravedad baja en vyperlang vyper
Vyper: incorrect order of evaluation of side effects for some builtins
Publicada el · Actualizada el
Aviso por correo cuando entre en el KEV, tenga PoC pública o suba de nota.
8Vexday Risk Score
Sin señal de explotación. Ningún artefacto público de explotación conocido hasta ahora.
ssvc Trackcvss 3.7epss 0.5%
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language. In affected versions the order of evaluation of the arguments of the builtin functions `uint256_addmod`, `uint256_mulmod`, `ecadd` and `ecmul` does not follow source order. This behaviour is problematic when the evaluation of one of the arguments produces side effects that other arguments depend on. A patch is currently being developed on pull request #3583. When using builtins from the list above, users should make sure that the arguments of the expression do not produce side effects or, if one does, that no other argument is dependent on those side effects.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Productos afectados
vyperlang · vyperCVEs relacionadas — vyperlang vyper
En el mismo producto, de las más peligrosas a las menos.
CVE-2024-24563CRITICALVyper array negative index vulnerabilityEPSS 1.5%CVE-2022-24845HIGHInteger bounds error in VyperEPSS 1.4%CVE-2022-29255HIGHMultiple evaluation of contract address in call in vyperEPSS 1.3%CVE-2023-31146HIGHVyper vulnerable to OOB DynArray access when array is on both LHS and RHS of an assignmentEPSS 1.3%CVE-2021-41121HIGHMemory corruption in VyperEPSS 1.1%CVE-2022-24787HIGHIncorrect Comparison in VyperEPSS 1.0%