CVE-2026-47734: fallo de gravedad media en jelmer dulwich
Dulwich has unbounded memory allocation in receive-pack from crafted thin packs
Publicada el · Actualizada el
Aviso por correo cuando entre en el KEV, tenga PoC pública o suba de nota.
13Vexday Risk Score
Sin señal de explotación. Ningún artefacto público de explotación conocido hasta ahora.
ssvc Trackcvss 5.7epss 0.2%
Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes) whose delta header declares a huge dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git's semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server's repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run the server under an OS-level memory limit (e.g. ulimit, cgroups/MemoryMax, or a container memory limit) so a malicious push is killed rather than taking down the host.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Productos afectados
jelmer · dulwichCVEs relacionadas — jelmer dulwich
En el mismo producto, de las más peligrosas a las menos.
CVE-2026-114094HIGHDulwich before 1.2.9 Arbitrary File Write via DOS drive letter pathsEPSS 0.9%CVE-2026-42305HIGHDulwich has an arbitrary file write via NTFS-hostile tree entries on WindowsEPSS 0.6%CVE-2026-42563HIGHDulwich Vulnerable to Command Injection via Merge Driver PathEPSS 0.6%CVE-2026-52726HIGHDulwich's submodule path traversal in porcelain.submodule_update / porcelain.clone(recurse_submodules=True) yields RCE via attacker-dropped .git/hooks payloadEPSS 0.4%CVE-2026-122299HIGHDulwich before 1.2.20 Commit Parser Tree Header MisinterpretationEPSS 0.3%CVE-2026-114095HIGHDulwich before 1.2.9 Infinite Loop DoS via Pack.resolve_objectEPSS 0.3%