CVE-2014-0195
40Vexday Risk Score
Patch soon. It has a working public exploit.
ssvc Attendepss 100%
from disclosure to weapon0 days
Published on NVDJun 5
metasploitJun 5
exploitation probability
100%top 1% of all CVEs
observed exploitation
nono source reports it
The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.
Affected products
n/a · n/aReferences
http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory9.aschttp://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/Once-Bled-Twice-Shy-OpenSSL-CVE-2014-0195/ba-p/6501048http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/ZDI-14-173-CVE-2014-0195-OpenSSL-DTLS-Fragment-Out-of-Bounds/ba-p/6501002http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00016.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140266410314613&w=2http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140317760000786&w=2http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140389274407904&w=2http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140389355508263&w=2