CVE-2014-3507
Published · Updated
E-mail alert when it lands in KEV, gets a public PoC or its score goes up.
15Vexday Risk Score
No sign of exploitation. No public exploitation artifact known so far.
ssvc Trackepss 55%
What the vendors declare (VEX)
Official vendor statements in CSAF/VEX format: whether their product is affected, already fixed, or ruled out — and why. These are the vendor's assertions, not Vexday's judgment.
Red HatVEX document ↗
Affected
1 product (3 components)
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 3
none_available: Affected
Fixed
17 products (154 components)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 7) · Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server (v. 6) · Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 7) · Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server Optional (v. 6) · Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop Optional (v. 6) · and others 12
Not affected
7 products (10 components) — because the vulnerable code is not present in the product
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5 · Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 · and others 2
Memory leak in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via zero-length DTLS fragments that trigger improper handling of the return value of a certain insert function.
Affected products
n/a · n/aReferences
ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-008.txt.aschttp://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory10.aschttp://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1052.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.htmlhttp://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.htmlhttp://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-08/msg00036.htmlhttp://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140853041709441&w=2http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=141077370928502&w=2http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142660345230545&w=2https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127502http://secunia.com/advisories/58962