CVE-2023-28112: medium-severity vulnerability in discourse
Discourse's SSRF protection missing for some FastImage requests
Published · Updated
E-mail alert when it lands in KEV, gets a public PoC or its score goes up.
13Vexday Risk Score
No sign of exploitation. No public exploitation artifact known so far.
ssvc Trackcvss 5.9epss 0.6%
Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Prior to version 3.1.0.beta3 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches, some user provided URLs were being passed to FastImage without SSRF protection. Insufficient protections could enable attackers to trigger outbound network connections from the Discourse server to private IP addresses. This affects any site running the `tests-passed` or `beta` branches versions 3.1.0.beta2 and prior. This issue is patched in version 3.1.0.beta3 of the `beta` and `tests-passed` branches. There are no known workarounds.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Affected products
discourse · discourseRelated CVEs — discourse
In the same product, most dangerous first.
CVE-2024-53991HIGHPotential Backup file leaked via Nginx in DiscourseEPSS 29.9%CVE-2021-41163CRITICALRCE via malicious SNS subscription payloadEPSS 19.8%CVE-2023-45131HIGHUnauthenticated access to new private chat messages in DiscourseEPSS 4.0%CVE-2026-28227LOWDiscourse Vulnerable to Unauthorized Topic Creation in Staff-Only Categories via Topic Timer publish_to_categoryEPSS 3.2%CVE-2022-36066CRITICALDiscourse vulnerable to RCE via admins uploading maliciously zipped fileEPSS 2.1%CVE-2024-47773HIGHAnonymous cache poisoning via XHR requests in DiscourseEPSS 1.8%