CVE-2024-52529: medium-severity vulnerability in cilium
Layer 7 policy enforcement may not occur in policies with wildcarded port ranges in Cilium
Published · Updated
E-mail alert when it lands in KEV, gets a public PoC or its score goes up.
13Vexday Risk Score
No sign of exploitation. No public exploitation artifact known so far.
ssvc Trackcvss 5.8epss 0.5%
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For users with the following configuration: 1. An allow policy that selects a Layer 3 destination and a port range `AND` 2. A Layer 7 allow policy that selects a specific port within the first policy's range the Layer 7 enforcement would not occur for the traffic selected by the Layer 7 policy. This issue only affects users who use Cilium's port range functionality, which was introduced in Cilium v1.16. This issue is patched in PR #35150. This issue affects Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.3 inclusive. This issue is patched in Cilium v1.16.4. Users are advised to upgrade. Users with network policies that match the pattern described above can work around the issue by rewriting any policies that use port ranges to individually specify the ports permitted for traffic.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Affected products
cilium · ciliumRelated CVEs — cilium
In the same product, most dangerous first.
CVE-2023-27595MEDIUMCilium eBPF filters may be temporarily removed during agent restartEPSS 0.7%CVE-2023-30851LOWPotential HTTP policy bypass when using header rules in CiliumEPSS 0.7%CVE-2024-28248HIGHCilium intermittent HTTP policy bypassEPSS 0.6%CVE-2024-42486MEDIUMCilium vulnerable to information leakage via incorrect ReferenceGrant update logic in Gateway APIEPSS 0.6%CVE-2023-39347HIGHCilium NetworkPolicy bypass via pod labelsEPSS 0.6%CVE-2023-27594MEDIUMCilium vulnerable to potential network policy bypass when routing IPv6 traffic EPSS 0.6%