CVE-2026-14535: high-severity vulnerability in trailofbits fickling
Fickling MLAllowlist analysis pass rendered inoperative by shared mutable state in AnalysisContext.shorten_code()
Published · Updated
E-mail alert when it lands in KEV, gets a public PoC or its score goes up.
21Vexday Risk Score
No sign of exploitation. No public exploitation artifact known so far.
ssvc Trackcvss 8.8epss 0.6%
In Trail of Bits fickling versions up to and including 0.1.11, the UnsafeImportsML analysis pass unconditionally calls AnalysisContext.shorten_code(node) on every import node it inspects, regardless of whether the import is flagged as unsafe. This call registers the shortened code representation in the shared AnalysisContext.reported_shortened_code set. When the MLAllowlist analysis pass subsequently runs, it calls the same shorten_code() method, receives already_reported=True for every import, and executes a continue statement that skips its allowlist check entirely. This renders MLAllowlist dead code for all imports — it never evaluates whether an import is in the ML allowlist or not. The MLAllowlist pass was designed to catch imports of modules outside the known-safe ML ecosystem (torch, numpy, transformers, etc.) that slip past the UnsafeImports denylist. With MLAllowlist inoperative, any standard library module not in the UNSAFE_IMPORTS denylist can be invoked via pickle deserialization while fickling's check_safety() returns LIKELY_SAFE. The fickling.load() API chains check_safety() into pickle.loads() as an explicit security gate, meaning a LIKELY_SAFE verdict causes the payload to be deserialized and executed. The root cause is shared mutable state between independently-correct analysis passes — UnsafeImportsML works as designed in isolation, MLAllowlist works as designed in isolation, but the shared reported_shortened_code set causes UnsafeImportsML to poison MLAllowlist's deduplication logic.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Affected products
trailofbits · ficklingRelated CVEs — trailofbits fickling
In the same product, most dangerous first.
CVE-2026-22609HIGHFickling has Static Analysis Bypass via Incomplete Dangerous Module BlocklistEPSS 0.6%CVE-2026-14534HIGHFickling check_safety() bypass via unlisted standard library modules (_posixsubprocess, site, atexit)EPSS 0.6%CVE-2026-22607HIGHFickling Blocklist Bypass: cProfile.run()EPSS 0.5%CVE-2026-22606HIGHFickling has a bypass via runpy.run_path() and runpy.run_module()EPSS 0.5%CVE-2026-118938HIGHFickling check_safety() bypass: dotted __qualname__ in STACK_GLOBAL resolves a class-method attribute path that evades call analysisEPSS 0.5%CVE-2026-16760HIGHFickling check_safety() bypass: likely_safe_imports grants module-origin trust to unvalidated standard library callablesEPSS 0.5%