CVE-2026-81681: critical vulnerability in jahlives openssl_encrypt
openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 False Encryption via Cleartext Storage
Published · Updated
E-mail alert when it lands in KEV, gets a public PoC or its score goes up.
28Vexday Risk Score
No sign of exploitation. No public exploitation artifact known so far.
ssvc Trackcvss 9.3epss 0.2%
openssl_encrypt (pip package openssl-encrypt) versions <= 1.4.8 advertise a portable USB workspace as an 'Encrypted USB Workspace' with AES-256-GCM encryption and write a marker declaring the workspace encrypted, but the workspace directory is actually stored in cleartext and the derived encryption key is never applied to it. A user who trusts the branding and places files in the workspace leaves them unencrypted on the removable media, so an attacker with physical access to the media can read the sensitive files. Fixed in 1.4.9, which seals the workspace into an authenticated AES-256-GCM vault.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Affected products
jahlives · openssl_encryptRelated CVEs — jahlives openssl_encrypt
In the same product, most dangerous first.
CVE-2026-74899CRITICALopenssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Sandbox Escape via Type HierarchyEPSS 0.8%CVE-2026-74878CRITICALopenssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 TOTP Rate Limiter BypassEPSS 0.7%CVE-2026-81690HIGHverify-usb before 1.4.9 Symlink Directory Traversal Code ExecutionEPSS 0.7%CVE-2026-74886CRITICALopenssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Plugin Import Guard BypassEPSS 0.7%CVE-2026-74895CRITICALopenssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Plugin Sandbox Bypass via Process IsolationEPSS 0.7%CVE-2026-74872CRITICALopenssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Arbitrary Code Execution via WhirlpoolEPSS 0.7%