CVE-2021-25218high

CVE-2021-25218: fallo de gravedad alta en ISC BIND9

A too-strict assertion check could be triggered when responses in BIND 9.16.19 and 9.17.16 require UDP fragmentation if RRL is in use

Publicada el · Actualizada el

Seguir esta CVE+ Monitorear BIND9+ Monitorear bind

Aviso por correo cuando entre en el KEV, tenga PoC pública o suba de nota.

21Vexday Risk Score

Sin señal de explotación. Ningún artefacto público de explotación conocido hasta ahora.

ssvc Trackcvss 7.5epss 3.7%
In BIND 9.16.19, 9.17.16. Also, version 9.16.19-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition When a vulnerable version of named receives a query under the circumstances described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion check. The vulnerability affects only BIND 9 releases 9.16.19, 9.17.16, and release 9.16.19-S1 of the BIND Supported Preview Edition.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Productos afectados
ISC · BIND9
CVEs relacionadas — ISC BIND9

En el mismo producto, de las más peligrosas a las menos.

CVE-2020-8617HIGHA logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.cEPSS 93.3%CVE-2021-25216HIGHA second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attackEPSS 83.0%CVE-2020-8625HIGHA vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attackEPSS 64.2%CVE-2021-25215HIGHAn assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itselfEPSS 11.7%CVE-2021-25219MEDIUMLame cache can be abused to severely degrade resolver performanceEPSS 11.2%CVE-2020-8616HIGHBIND does not sufficiently limit the number of fetches performed when processing referralsEPSS 10.9%