CVE-2021-25218high

CVE-2021-25218: falha de alta gravidade em ISC BIND9

A too-strict assertion check could be triggered when responses in BIND 9.16.19 and 9.17.16 require UDP fragmentation if RRL is in use

Publicada em · Atualizada em

Seguir esta CVE+ Monitorar BIND9+ Monitorar bind

Aviso por e-mail quando ela entrar no KEV, ganhar PoC pública ou subir de nota.

21Vexday Risk Score

Sem sinal de exploração. Nenhum artefato público de exploração conhecido até agora.

ssvc Trackcvss 7.5epss 3.7%
In BIND 9.16.19, 9.17.16. Also, version 9.16.19-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition When a vulnerable version of named receives a query under the circumstances described above, the named process will terminate due to a failed assertion check. The vulnerability affects only BIND 9 releases 9.16.19, 9.17.16, and release 9.16.19-S1 of the BIND Supported Preview Edition.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Produtos afetados
ISC · BIND9
CVEs relacionadas — ISC BIND9

No mesmo produto, das mais perigosas para as menos.

CVE-2020-8617HIGHA logic error in code which checks TSIG validity can be used to trigger an assertion failure in tsig.cEPSS 93.3%CVE-2021-25216HIGHA second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attackEPSS 83.0%CVE-2020-8625HIGHA vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attackEPSS 64.2%CVE-2021-25215HIGHAn assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itselfEPSS 11.7%CVE-2021-25219MEDIUMLame cache can be abused to severely degrade resolver performanceEPSS 11.2%CVE-2020-8616HIGHBIND does not sufficiently limit the number of fetches performed when processing referralsEPSS 10.9%